Hurricane Dorian: How today’s tech would have changed everything

Hurricane Dorian: How today’s tech would have changed everything

The wrath of Hurricane Dorian

It was the sound I remember most. A deep, bone-rattling roar.

Or maybe it was the visuals: peeking through a crack in the shutters and seeing only a wall of wild energy racing by, a white void swallowing up the landscape and everything in it. Houses, trees, even cars parked a few feet away.

Or was it the sensations? The pulsing, painful feeling in my ears. The vibrating in my chest.

Maybe it was all of the above.

Screenshot 2026-11-04 at 11.20.21 PM

It's hard to capture in words, yet I remember it so well: riding out the inner core of Category 5 Hurricane Dorian in Marsh Harbour on Great Abaco Island in the Bahamas. It was 2019.

This was the strongest hurricane landfall on record in North America (tied with two other events). And I was at Ground Zero. In the worst of it. In a tiny concrete classroom getting pounded by gusts estimated at over 220 mph.

When I ventured out into the scarred landscape after the hurricane passed, the destruction was shocking. Hard to process.

Houses flattened. Concrete smashed. Cars thrown like toys. Whole neighborhoods literally erased. Gone.

From inside the eye

That's what I call a tough day at the office.

Yep, getting inside hurricanes is my work. I chase them all over the globe: in every hemisphere, on any continent, in places where they're not even called hurricanes. To date, I've penetrated the inner cores of 88 hurricanes on the ground—a world record.

My purpose: documenting the storms as they strike land, not just with video and imagery, but with hard data.

Before a landfall event, I deploy devices across the expected impact zone to measure key metrics like minimum sea-level pressure, pressure gradients, and pressure fluctuations. These are the numbers that tell us how strong the hurricane was and what kind of structure it had.

I also survey and document damage. In many impacts, especially in remote corners of developing nations, my photos and videos are some of the first images to make it to the outside world.

This part of my work is especially important, because that's when help comes: when the rest of the world sees pictures from the impact zone.

Screenshot 2026-10-27 at 8.40.50 AM

The limits of being on the ground

I'm good at what I do. But with Hurricane Dorian, I felt completely inadequate.

The impact was so extreme I knew I couldn't do it justice. I wouldn't be able to capture its scale and scope, no matter how hard I tried. And it would take proper ground teams weeks or even months to uncover the full extent of the destruction.

Not only was the impact zone huge (tens of miles wide), it was deep. The wind and water damage was exceedingly severe. In Marsh Harbour, the poorer, low-lying neighborhoods, like the Mudd and the Pigeon Pea, had been obliterated, with all structures swept away. I couldn't even find the streets. Even the wealthier, higher parts of town saw widespread, heavy wind damage, with many complete structural failures.

All communications were down. The island was cut off from the outside world. The small medical clinic was overflowing with the traumatically injured.

Screenshot 2026-10-27 at 8.41.26 AM

Worse, Dorian was extremely slow-moving, so even 48 hours after the hurricane's violent core struck the island, Marsh Harbour was still getting hammered by rain and tropical-storm-force winds. This delayed aerial damage surveys, which require clear skies, as well as the arrival of outside relief.

On the ground, things were spinning out of control. With many hundreds dead, missing, or injured, thousands displaced, no power or running water, and very little food, a humanitarian crisis was brewing.

But did the outside world even know? Did they understand the extent of it?

Seeing the full scale of a disaster like Dorian, within hours

For me, the Dorian catastrophe really drove home the need for immediate impact assessments.

When an entire society is smashed beyond recognition, days later is not good enough. Governments, rescue crews, NGOs, and insurance companies need to know what happened now.

The answer is synthetic aperture radar—or SAR, for short.

It's a remote-sensing technique that uses pulses of microwave energy to create images of Earth's surface and the things on it, like buildings and infrastructure.

The impact of SAR on hurricane response

 

Using SAR beats traditional aerial damage surveys and ground teams for a bunch of reasons:

Faster. Aerial and optical satellite surveys use cameras that need daylight and clear skies. That means big delays in getting images when cloud cover lingers over the stricken region for days after impact, like it did with Dorian. ICEYE doesn't have this problem. Because it uses SAR technology, it can capture images anytime, through darkness and cloud cover. So, images are ready fast: just hours after impact, and continuously as the event evolves. This enables near-real-time impact assessment, which means faster response, faster funding, and faster relief for victims.

Better. Synthetic Aperture Radar imaging can be wide—able to capture a disaster's entire footprint over hundreds of square miles—yet also extremely detailed, showing inundation down to the inch and wind damage down to the individual building. These depictions aren't estimates or computer models; they're observed evidence of what happened. This combination of breadth and detail lets responders immediately know the range and severity of the impact, and where ground teams need to go first.

Cheaper. Aerial reconnaissance is pricey (often over $1,000 an hour) and dependent on conditions, time of day, and airspace. A global constellation of SAR satellites is always at the ready, which makes it more cost-effective.

Easier. For emergency responders, it’s best to use a SAR provider like ICEYE, because their data come as ready-to-use ArcGIS layers. That's the platform 95% of their clients already run! So, there's no new system to learn and no big, complicated ramp-up to start using it.

A new era of mapping hurricane damage

ICEYE launched its Hurricane Solution in March 2025, ahead of that year’s Atlantic hurricane season, to deliver wind and flood impact data for US landfalls within 24 hours. It pairs multiple radar-based products. Because radar sees through cloud and darkness, both work while skies are still overcast and aircraft are grounded.

Hurricane Rapid Impact compares satellite images taken before and after landfall to flag where the ground has changed, with results within 24 hours. One layer shows which neighborhoods were hit hardest; a finer 1.5 m layer resolves damage to individual buildings. After Hurricane Milton in 2024, it picked up the torn roof of Tropicana Field in St. Petersburg.

ICEYE Hurricane Rapid Impact - icyclone

Flood Rapid Impact highlights flood extent every 6 hours, from pre-landfall until the water has receded—leveraging the full constellation and a machine-learning process to extract water within the imagery.

And Flood Insights maps the maximum flooding within 24 hours of its peak, showing how far the water reached and how deep it was at 4 m horizontal resolution, with updates as it spreads.

For emergency managers on the ground, that means knowing which roads are passable, which neighborhoods need search teams first, and where to stage supplies—all before a single survey flight can take off. After Dorian, Marsh Harbour waited days for that picture.

Preparing for the next Dorian

When I’m not chasing hurricanes, I’m on the speaking circuit, sharing what I’ve seen on the ground with emergency managers and insurance folks. My goal is to help them prepare for the big impacts that will inevitably come their way.

I often think about how differently Dorian could have played out with today’s tools. The storm’s core struck Great Abaco on September 1, 2019, and then it stalled. For days, clouds sat over the islands, survey aircraft couldn’t fly, and the phones were dead. The outside world was largely guessing.

With today’s SAR capabilities, a damage map of Marsh Harbour could have been in responders’ hands within about a day of landfall, while the rain was still falling. It would have shown, block by block, that the Mudd and the Pigeon Pea were gone, how deep the water ran, and which higher neighborhoods had lost roofs and walls. Search teams could have gone straight to the worst-hit areas. Relief organizations could have planned supply drops around what was actually still standing. And insurers could have started sizing losses days earlier, which gets money to people who need to rebuild sooner.

That’s the difference between responding to what you can see and responding to what actually happened.

icyclone-2

3 key takeaways

Here are three things I’d encourage every emergency management and insurance team to take back to their organization:

    • Don’t let the weather decide when you see the damage. Optical satellites and survey aircraft need daylight and clear skies, and a slow-moving storm like Dorian can prevent both for days. Radar’s microwave pulses pass through cloud and work at night, so your first look at the damage no longer has to wait for the skies to clear.
    • Plan around observed evidence, not estimates. In the first few days after landfall, decisions often rest on models and scattered field reports. SAR compares before-and-after imagery to show where damage actually occurred, and it separates wind damage from flooding, two perils that hit Marsh Harbour’s neighborhoods in very different ways.
    • Get the data into your workflow before landfall, not after. Information only helps if your team already knows how to read it and act on it when the storm hits. Bringing SAR layers into your existing GIS tools and response plans now means they’re ready on day one, not day five.

 

I was blown away when I first saw what ICEYE can do, and what science now allows. Dorian taught me what it costs to wait for the clouds to clear. Responders shouldn’t have to anymore.

Additional resources:

 

 

 

Horseshoe_Beach_Florida_Aug7PR

WEBINAR

Webinar: Florida uses satellite intelligence
to lead flood response

Case Study

Hurricane Melissa

As Hurricane Melissa stalled over the Caribbean in late October 2025, relentless rainfall caused catastrophic flooding across Jamaica. In the wake of the storm, ICEYE made its Flood Rapid Impact data and Hurricane Rapid Impact freely available to government agencies and NGOs through Esri’s Disaster Response Program, helping response teams prioritize resources and protect lives.